Springfield Armory 1911A1 TRP Operator® Single Action Semi-Automatic Pistol, 10 mm, 6″ Barrel, Black Matte Armory Kote Finish, VZ Alien Dirty Olive G-10 Grips, Two 8 Round Magazines, Gen 2 Speed Trigger, Front Serrations, Accessory Rail, Octo-Grip Front Strap, Fully Adjustable 3-Dot Tritium Sights, Packed In Range Bag
Smith & Wesson M&P 15 Semi-Automatic Rifle, 223 Rem, 556 NATO, 16″ M4 Barrel with A2 Birdcage Flash Suppressor, Black Finish, Black 6 Position Collapsible Stock, Adjustable Rear Sight, One 30 Round, Additional Side Front Sling Swivel, Removable Carry Handle
KRISS Vector “Super V” SBR (Short Barreled Rifle). Semi-Automatic, chambered in .45 ACP.The world”s lightest, most controllable and most accurate short barrel rifle. The patented KRISS Super V System virtually eliminates felt recoil and muzzle climb.
Magnum Research 1911G Semi-automatic Single Action Full 45 ACP 5 in Steel Black Wood 8Rd 2 Mags Fired Case Fixed Sights DE1911G (DE 1911 45ACP 5 in BLK FS)
Springfield Armory Limited Edition Camp Perry M1A . Semi-automatic rifle, chambered in .308 Win with 22 in barrel. This Camp Perry model has a custom engraved walnut stock and includes a hardshell display case, a canvas bag, one 10Rd magazine and are fitted with Camp Perry Limited Edition adjustable sights.
Weatherby (WBY) Vanguard S2 RC (Range Certified) Bolt Action Rifle, 300 Win, 24″ Barrel, Matte Blue Finish, Green Monte Carlo Stock with Black Spiderwebbing
Sig Sauer Blackwater Special Edition P226 Semi-automatic Double Action, Full Size, 9MM, 4.4″ Barrel, Alloy Frame, Blue Finish, Black Wood Grips with Blackwater Logo
This election is about the integrity of our nation and the security of our freedoms.
Elections don’t make democracies; free and fair elections do. Today, in the midst of post-election chaos, we find ourselves in a fight for the latter. In that sense, this election is about far more than Donald Trump the man, or even his policies. The question is this: either democracy survives or one political party will be allowed to bully, lie, cheat, and steal its way into power.
The stakes, at this moment, in this country that we love, could not be higher. Some Republicans are used to losing and habituated to concession, but the President and the largest number of voters for any Republican in American history know that fighting until the end is necessary–and winning is not wrong.
For five years, the Democratic party and their allies in the corporate media, the coddled government bureaucracies, and the Big Tech platforms have fought Trump with every weapon at their disposal.
They uncritically and feverishly repeated every deranged theory that Trump was really a Russian asset operating as Putin’s Manchurian candidate, and then cheered on his impeachment for it. An FBI lawyer altered evidence to spy on a U.S. citizen while texting “viva la resistance” to his colleagues. When, less than a month before the election, Facebook and Twitter outright banned the circulation of a New York Post story involving corruption in the Biden family, media outlets happily did the same.
The New York Times accused Trump of faking his post-COVID White House appearance with a green screen and using secret Twitter code to activate right-wing extremists. CNN is now settling libel suits for its role in instigating a vicious social media campaign and physical threats against a Catholic high school kid—all for the crime of wearing a MAGA hat.
Media outlets that breathlessly ran with a fake story about Trump killing an entire pond of koi fish refused to cover the violent riots that broke out across the country this summer. They stood in front of buildings that were literally on fire, claiming the protests were “fiery, but mostly peaceful.” They told us that border walls don’t stop illegal immigration, riots don’t spread COVID-19 (but schools and church services do), and Joe Biden would win in a landslide.
Congressional Democrats, meanwhile, ran on a platform meant to fundamentally reshape our institutions in order to reshape the country with a permanent Democrat majority. Packing the Supreme Court isn’t about checks and balances. It’s about institutionalizing Democrat power. Adding D.C. and Puerto Rico as states isn’t about benevolence. It’s about adding four additional Democrat senators. Abolishing the electoral college isn’t about some distorted notion of fairness. It’s about cementing an outsized role for coastal urban centers in selecting our presidents.
Yet these are the people—the alliance of mainstream media, Big Tech platforms, and a Democrat party hell-bent on accumulating and permanently fortifying power for themselves—who want you to believe that the unmonitored vote counting of unprecedented numbers of mail-in ballots which mysteriously continue to appear, as though summoned, are completely aboveboard. They want you to listen as they lecture you about “what’s good for the country.” They want you to believe them when they paint every good-faith Republican effort to ensure democratic transparency as fascist tyranny. They want to shame you into meek submission “for democracy.”
Absolutely not. They have not earned our trust, and they do not deserve it. They should be given no political quarter.
This election is about the presidency, yes, but more than any other, it is about who will rule: the militant woke inquisitionists who think “healing America” involves excluding half of it, or Donald Trump, the chaotic TV personality who careened into D.C. guns blazing and accidentally unmasked the stinking institutional rot of Washington’s uniparty corruption. There’s only one option available for the United States Constitution and its supporters.
The fight of this election is as much existential as it is political; it is between a party that will defend our way of life, however imperfectly, and a party that has every intention of crushing it.
Every legal vote must be counted. Every measure must be taken. Not an inch should be given—not just for one side or the other, but to restore a modicum of faith in the mechanisms of America’s election and governance.
The militant Left that has lied to America countless times cannot be trusted suddenly to tell the truth about what’s happening. Open the count, line up observers, ensure every vote cast is a legal one. If there are discrepancies, they must be explained rather than dismissed. Our self-government requires consensus. That consensus is fragile. Without trust at its foundation, it will shatter. The 71 million people who cast a vote for Donald Trump deserve this transparency as much as every other American voter.
This is the fourth quarter and we have no choice but to leave it all on the field. We may lose, but we must do so battle-scarred and bloody, fighting like our ability to live as a free-thinking, free-speaking, free-praying people of one nation depends on it—because these last four years have shown how much it truly does.
_____________________
Rachel Bovard is a 2020 Claremont Institute Lincoln fellow, senior director of policy at the Conservative Partnership Institute, a fellow at Defense Priorities, and a senior advisor to the Internet Accountability Project.
A phenomenological law also called the first digit law, first digit phenomenon, or leading digit phenomenon. Benford’s law states that in listings, tables of statistics, etc., the digit 1 tends to occur with probability, much greater than the expected 11.1% (i.e., one digit out of 9). Benford’s law can be observed, for instance, by examining tables of logarithms and noting that the first pages are much more worn and smudged than later pages (Newcomb 1881). While Benford’s law unquestionably applies to many situations in the real world, a satisfactory explanation has been given only recently through the work of Hill (1998).
Benford’s law was used by the character Charlie Eppes as an analogy to help solve a series of high burglaries in the Season 2 “The Running Man” episode (2006) of the television crime drama NUMB3RS.
Benford’s law applies to data that are not dimensionless, so the numerical values of the data depend on the units. If there exists a universal probability distribution over such numbers, then it must be invariant under a change of scale, so
(1)
If , then , and normalization implies . Differentiating with respect to and setting gives
(2)
having solution . Although this is not a proper probability distribution (since it diverges), both the laws of physics and human convention impose cutoffs. For example, randomly selected street addresses obey something close to Benford’s law.
If many powers of 10 lie between the cutoffs, then the probability that the first (decimal) digit is is given by a logarithmic distribution
(3)
for , …, 9, illustrated above and tabulated below.
1
0.30103
6
0.0669468
2
0.176091
7
0.0579919
3
0.124939
8
0.0511525
4
0.09691
9
0.0457575
5
0.0791812
However, Benford’s law applies not only to scale-invariant data, but also to numbers chosen from a variety of different sources. Explaining this fact requires a more rigorous investigation of central limit-like theorems for the mantissas of random variables under multiplication. As the number of variables increases, the density function approaches that of the above logarithmic distribution. Hill (1998) rigorously demonstrated that the “distribution of distributions” given by random samples taken from a variety of different distributions is, in fact, Benford’s law (Matthews).
One striking example of Benford’s law is given by the 54 million real constants in Plouffe’s “Inverse Symbolic Calculator” database, 30% of which begin with the digit 1. Taking data from several disparate sources, the table below shows the distribution of first digits as compiled by Benford (1938) in his original paper.
col.
title
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
samples
A
Rivers, Area
31.0
16.4
10.7
11.3
7.2
8.6
5.5
4.2
5.1
335
B
Population
33.9
20.4
14.2
8.1
7.2
6.2
4.1
3.7
2.2
3259
C
Constants
41.3
14.4
4.8
8.6
10.6
5.8
1.0
2.9
10.6
104
D
Newspapers
30.0
18.0
12.0
10.0
8.0
6.0
6.0
5.0
5.0
100
E
Specific Heat
24.0
18.4
16.2
14.6
10.6
4.1
3.2
4.8
4.1
1389
F
Pressure
29.6
18.3
12.8
9.8
8.3
6.4
5.7
4.4
4.7
703
G
H.P. Lost
30.0
18.4
11.9
10.8
8.1
7.0
5.1
5.1
3.6
690
H
Mol. Wgt.
26.7
25.2
15.4
10.8
6.7
5.1
4.1
2.8
3.2
1800
I
Drainage
27.1
23.9
13.8
12.6
8.2
5.0
5.0
2.5
1.9
159
J
Atomic Wgt.
47.2
18.7
5.5
4.4
6.6
4.4
3.3
4.4
5.5
91
K
,
25.7
20.3
9.7
6.8
6.6
6.8
7.2
8.0
8.9
5000
L
Design
26.8
14.8
14.3
7.5
8.3
8.4
7.0
7.3
5.6
560
M
Reader’s Digest
33.4
18.5
12.4
7.5
7.1
6.5
5.5
4.9
4.2
308
N
Cost Data
32.4
18.8
10.1
10.1
9.8
5.5
4.7
5.5
3.1
741
O
X-Ray Volts
27.9
17.5
14.4
9.0
8.1
7.4
5.1
5.8
4.8
707
P
Am. League
32.7
17.6
12.6
9.8
7.4
6.4
4.9
5.6
3.0
1458
Q
Blackbody
31.0
17.3
14.1
8.7
6.6
7.0
5.2
4.7
5.4
1165
R
Addresses
28.9
19.2
12.6
8.8
8.5
6.4
5.6
5.0
5.0
342
S
,
25.3
16.0
12.0
10.0
8.5
8.8
6.8
7.1
5.5
900
T
Death Rate
27.0
18.6
15.7
9.4
6.7
6.5
7.2
4.8
4.1
418
Average
30.6
18.5
12.4
9.4
8.0
6.4
5.1
4.9
4.7
1011
Probable Error
The following table gives the distribution of the first digit of the mantissa following Benford’s Law using a number of different methods.
Newcomb, S. “Note on the Frequency of the Use of Digits in Natural Numbers.” Amer. J. Math.4, 39-40, 1881.
Nigrini, M. J. The Detection of Income Tax Evasion Through an Analysis of Digital Frequencies. Ph.D. thesis. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati, 1992.
Nigrini, M. “A Taxpayer Compliance Application of Benford’s Law.” J. Amer. Tax. Assoc.18, 72-91, 1996.
Category: Crime|Comments Off on Hunter Biden’s Laptop
I think I have seen all I need to conclude that the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop disqualifies Joe Biden from any public office in these United States.
Category: Politics|Comments Off on Democrats Are Coming for Your Guns
Joe Biden’s campaign website contains a long list of gun-control proposals: national gun licensing; red-flag laws, which let judges seize guns without a hearing or mental-health evaluation; and bans on semiautomatic guns that look like military weapons.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died of metastatic pancreatic cancer at age 87, according to the U.S. Supreme Court
Appointed to the nation’s highest court in 1993 by former President Bill Clinton, Ginsburg was the oldest sitting member on the court. Despite a lengthy career on the court, she had never missed arguments until January 2019.
To answer all of those who would say “I can’t believe you would vote for Trump.” Well folks, listen up!
I’m not voting for him.
I’m voting for the 2nd Amendment.
I’m voting for another Conservative Supreme Court justice.
I’m voting for the Electoral College, and the Republic the Founders bequeathed us.
I’m voting for law enforcement, and the rule of law. I’m voting for the rights of the unborn.
I’m voting for the flag that is always missing from the Democratic background.
I’m voting for the 1st Amendment, which means the right to speak my opinion and not be censored or fired from my job.
I’m voting for secure borders. I’m voting for the right to worship my God without fear.
I’m voting for freedom and the American Dream. I’m voting for good and against evil.
I’m not just voting for a person, I’m voting for the future of my Country!
Category: Homefront|Comments Off on The Insurrection Act – 1807
An Act authorizing the employment of the land and naval forces of the United States, in cases of insurrections
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That in all cases of insurrection, or obstruction to the laws, either of the United States, or of any individual state or territory, where it is lawful for the President of the United States to call forth the militia for the purpose of suppressing such insurrection, or of causing the laws to be duly executed, it shall be lawful for him to employ, for the same purposes, such part of the land or naval force of the United States, as shall be judged necessary, having first observed all the pre-requisites of the law in that respect.
APPROVED, March 3, 1807.
Mr. President, invoke the IA and turn the militia loose on these insurrectionists now.
… “if you do your part, the Trumpslide will be historic, and you can start watching the Enemy Media weeping and wailing starting at seven or eight pm eastern, rather than having to wait till later in the evening.”
"Anyone who still wants guns, rifles or ammo should go to Traction Control/Well-Regulated Militia: http://tinyurl.com/2ea4lhn Still pre-panic prices and a huge inventory and good reliable service. Tell everyone you know"
Posted by: DAve at December 23, 2012 02:55 PM (XDC0v) at AoSHQ
Category: 
, much greater than the expected 11.1% (i.e., one digit out of 9). Benford’s law can be observed, for instance, by examining tables of 
over such numbers, then it must be invariant under a change of scale, so
, then 
, and normalization implies 
. Differentiating with respect to 
and setting 
gives
. Although this is not a proper probability distribution (since it diverges), both the laws of physics and human convention impose cutoffs. For example, randomly selected street addresses obey something close to Benford’s law.
is given by a logarithmic distribution
, …, 9, illustrated above and tabulated below.
, 
, 
.” Amer. Math. Monthly 73, 1056-1061, 1966.
